Structural differentiation in the reparation of crimes becomes an existential problem for religion. Because revenge can be both a duty and a crime. Punishment takes different forms in different legal systems; Hence «summum ius, summa iniuria» («Strict justice can be the height of injustice»). The Greek tragedy presents the myth of inevitable guilt and the problem of whether justice is actually achieved through criminal retaliation. In the Hebrew Scriptures (Old Testament), the administration of retaliation, unlike that found in Roman and Babylonian law, is still a tribal matter (see Deuteronomy 19:21; Lev. 24:20; Ex 21:23-25). Talion is here a legal principle that operates within the framework of fundamental legal responsibility and cannot be defined independently of the principle of fair exchange and its beneficial character for life. It is a formula for giving and receiving in the realm of authority over the clan. It is in a personal context: «If evil ensues, then you will give life for life, an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, burning for burning, wound for wound, band for band» (Ex 21:23-25). I am also personally familiar with revenge. For ten years, I suffered from a situation that led me to justify myself, if not to take revenge. Someone in my personal life was campaigning to get me. Twice in these ten years, the truth has been revealed.
The first time I learned the truth. But the second time, everyone saw it. The people who were there told others. This cat was out of the bag and it set me free in a way. The chthonic goddesses, who embodied a matriarchal order, were related to the gods of Olympus in various ways. The sanctuary of Zeus at Olympia, the sanctuary of Apollo at Delphi and Athens, the city of Athena, were places where chthonic goddesses were originally worshipped. These goddesses, the daughters of Gaia, the highest authority of justice on earth, included Demeter (one of her titles was Erinys) and Themis, goddess of communities and assembly rights. Among them were many other deities of later descent, whose myths emphasize the incompatibility of earthly justice and heavenly punishment, divine law and earthly destiny. Nemesis, goddess of vengeance, and the Moirai, goddesses of fate, were the daughters of the night (the goddess Nux).
They punished pride and took revenge on those who attained happiness, for injustice was punished by injustice, and happiness that was not accompanied by misfortune aroused the envy of the gods. Of course, laws must be underpinned by action, education and practical support for victims. Even in states where image-based sexual abuse is criminalized, investigating and prosecuting these devastating crimes is not always a priority for overwhelmed police departments and prosecutors. Some police departments, particularly in rural areas, lack the technical expertise or tools to effectively investigate cybercrime. We believe that anti-revenge laws must be supported with additional training and resources so that law enforcement can properly investigate image-based sexual abuse and treat victims with sensitivity and respect. Will this lady face legal retaliation, or is her revenge justified? Islam has two sources of retaliatory laws: bloody revenge and judicial punishment. The clan has the right to kill the murderer of one of its members, provided that the murderer acted on his own responsibility and intentionally. But Muḥammad further limits the application: the right can only be exercised over the legally and morally responsible person. The legal principle embodied here is also found in many non-Roman legal systems. These include cuneiform law, mosaic law, and Islamic law.
What happened in the good old days when an angry friend took revenge on her handsome philanthropist by breaking the windows of her car? (This website provides only a thematic overview of the U.S. Revenge Pornography Act and does not constitute legal advice.) Most state revenge laws are criminal laws that prohibit the distribution of non-consensual pornography. Their protection and sanctions vary from State to State. For example, states classify non-consensual pornographic crimes differently — some, like Connecticut, classify them as a misdemeanor, while others, like New Hampshire, classify them as a crime. These are important differences, as crimes are considered more serious than misdemeanors and are punishable by harsher penalties, such as longer prison sentences or higher fines. Police are also more likely to extradite perpetrators across state borders for felonies than misdemeanors. If you`re about to divorce or are already in court proceedings, you may want revenge. As Fight Club author Chuck Palahniuk wrote: «This is the best revenge of all: luck.
Nothing makes people crazier than seeing someone who has a good one. Life. Today`s despised women are more tech-savvy. An unfortunate Japanese woman retaliated by throwing her unfaithful friend`s iMac, iPhone, iPad and accessories into a bathtub filled with water. She made him feel the pain by sending him pictures of his swimsuit. These forms of extinguishment are governed by the principle of damage caused, not guilt; That is, it is the act itself, and not its responsibility, that produces revenge. Moreover, the principle of collective responsibility, not individual responsibility, applies: the group, not the perpetrator, is responsible; In addition, the rank of the injured party is taken into account in the compensation. Only those who are legally recognized as persons and not slaves are capable of revenge. An interactive map showing the laws of revenge for each state can be found on the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative. Visit: cybercivilrights.org/nonconsensual-pornagraphy-laws/ Q: A friend – or rather, an «old friend» – posted a photo of me online as a prank.